Plan-Sarthi uses essential cookies to keep you signed in and to remember your workspace preferences, plus optional analytics cookies that help us improve the platform. You can reject the optional ones and still use everything. Read our Cookie Policy

All posts Claims & Contracts

The hindrance register that wins extension-of-time claims

Plan-Sarthi Editorial 14 May 20267 min read

Most delay claims fail on evidence, not on merit. The difference is whether the delay was recorded on the day it happened or reconstructed eighteen months later.

Record it the day it happens

A hindrance logged on the date, against the specific activity, with the crew and plant idled, is a contemporaneous record. The same facts assembled from memory before an arbitration are an assertion. Consultants can tell the difference in a minute.

Attribute it honestly

Client-side, contractor-side or neutral — write down which. A register where every delay is the client's fault destroys its own credibility, and with it the entries that were genuinely theirs.

Price it and link it to float

A delay only entitles you to time if it consumed float on the critical path. Log the hindrance against the activity, let the CPM engine show whether that activity was driving completion, and attach the idle-cost computation. Time and money in one record.

Notice periods are unforgiving

Most Indian EPC contracts require notice within a fixed window. A register that is up to date makes notices routine; one that is three months behind quietly forfeits the entitlement.

Plan-Sarthi puts these practices into one workspace — validated DPRs driving the S-curve, critical path, earned value and forecast automatically.

Start the 14-day free trial

Read next

Questions or a topic you want covered? Write to admin@plansarthi.com.